Two Types of Implied Contracts

Implied contracts can take two forms based on factual or non-factual circumstances.

Implied-In-Fact

  • There are more than words or an oral agreement to assess.
  • Acts like dealing/performance are important.
  • There is intention, mutual agreement, and promise between parties.
  • The duration can last for years, even after expiration.
  • The effects of terms and obligations are similar to those of express contracts.

Implied-In-Law

  • There is no oral or written agreement.
  • There is no importance placed on acts.
  • There is no intention, mutual agreement, or promise. These do not have to take place.
  • The defendant cannot take advantage of/gain illegally through undeserved privileges.
  • Obligation is based on justice.
  • It has the power to go against people's will if necessary.
  • It does not deal with the same subject matter present in other contracts.
  • It is valid only for correction purposes.
  • It is evaluated case by case.
  • It favors the damaged party. As if from contracts (quasi ex contractu) require recompensation from the offender. The beneficiary pays fairly.

Elements of Implied-In-Fact Contracts

There are specific aspects that are essential to note in this type of implied agreement.

  • The plaintiff sells a product or idea.
  • The plaintiff conditions the payment of the product or idea.
  • The defendant is supposed to know or did know what the payment of the product or idea was about.
  • The defendant approves voluntarily of the transaction matter regarding the product or idea.
  • The defendant used the product or idea.
  • The plaintiff's product or idea had value, even if little.
  • The defendant impliedly assured to pay for the usage of the product or idea.

Examples of Real Life Implied-In-Fact Applications

  • An individual infringes on the rights of another individual by trademarking his literature or idea.
  • A store owner fails to compensate an employee after a mutually agreed discussion regarding the payment of his service, resulting in an unpaid service. The owner had an intention of paying the employee as discussed together, but he did not carry out this task successfully.

Oral Contracts: Are They Enforceable

Not all contracts must be in writing. The State of Frauds, which are state laws, only require some contracts to be created by this method of communication. It is recommended though that promises be kept in writing.

The Significance of Writing

In general, there are essential instances where writing is significant for such transactions.

  • The sales of particular goods.
  • The sales of land.
  • Matters of debt.
  • Cases where more than a year's timing is needed.
  • Imbalanced dollar amounts.

Features of Express Contracts

  • Are the most commonly seen in business transactions.
  • Communications exist in oral or written form.
  • They carry unquestionable terms and conditions.

Questions About Implied-In-Law Contracts

Contracts are involved between voluntary, competent parties. They place importance on the value of services. Once the offeror gives an offer, the next step is to have the offeree accept the offer. If the offer is not approved, the counter-offer ends the contract. Performance and consideration are main key factors where both parties can benefit from the transaction are enforced. There are not only expressed contracts, but also types of implied contracts as well.

If you need help with implied-in-law contracts, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel accepts only the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.